<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jared R. Byer - Journal &#187; Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/tag/knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Problem of Math and the Law of Identity</title>
		<link>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/10/the-problem-of-math-and-the-law-of-identity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/10/the-problem-of-math-and-the-law-of-identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaredrbyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dialetheistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law of Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaBloPoMo '07]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XKCD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post will question whether Math is a properly basic belief.  I have what I hold to be a reasonable argument so please hold with me dismissing the topic. 
In epistemology there are a number of strong theories of knowledge.  These range from saying that you can not know anything  to saying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/10/the-problem-of-math-and-the-law-of-identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why K and the Man Who Shot JTB</title>
		<link>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/04/why-k-and-the-man-who-shoot-jtb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/04/why-k-and-the-man-who-shoot-jtb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaredrbyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gettier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justified True Belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaBloPoMo '07]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Value Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question comes up what is so important about “knowledge.”  There are two possible answers that come to mind.  Either knowledge has value in and of itself or it has value in relation to something else.  If knowledge has value for its own sake than we say it has intrinsic value.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/04/why-k-and-the-man-who-shoot-jtb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An introduction to Knowledge Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/03/an-introduction-to-knowledge-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/03/an-introduction-to-knowledge-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaredrbyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaBloPoMo '07]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our day to day lives we claim knowledge of many things.  You know what horses raced  last weekend, you know what horses are racing next weekend and sometimes you might even say you know which horse is going to win next weekend.  Have you ever said you knew something and later [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jaredrbyer.com/journal/2007/11/03/an-introduction-to-knowledge-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
